Monday, April 17, 2017

20170417 (MALE judge weeps for MALE criminal)

Keith Vallejo, convicted sex offender, deemed by Provo Judge Thomas Low tearfully "a good man"
I’ve been trying to understand

The motive of a self-described

Contemporary conservative 

(Who will not admit he voted

For Dump) in defending Provo

Judge Thomas Low’s comments

And manner in sentencing Keith

Vallejo, a former Mormon bishop,

Who had been convicted of one

First degree felony of object rape

And ten second degree felonies

Of forcible sexual abuse. Judge 

Low sentenced the convicted

Offender to five years to life

For the offenses but in the 

Presence of Ms Julia Kirby,

One of the two victims, went

On to note in a tearful commentary

That Mr. Vallejo was an “extraordinarily

Good man. But great men sometimes 

Do bad things.” At no point did the 

Judge point out to Mr. Vallejo, who 

Denied the charges throughout, 

That he should take responsibility

For the harm he did to the victims.

Earlier this judge had released him

Following his conviction in February

To be free at home pending his

Sentencing on April 13. The judge

Changed his mind and Vallejo

Was placed in jail from March 30.

Fifty good character letters had

Been received praising Vallejo’s

Many acts of kindness and his

Service as a volunteer bishop

In the Church of the Latter-Day

Saints, seeking the Judge’s

Sympathy for the convict.

When I raised the topic as an

Example of typical Mormon

Male preference to my male

Conservative colleague he

Exploded, “You haven’t got 

All the facts. You take Rachel 

Maddow at her word in some

Abbreviated retelling and she

Leaves out the important factor

That so many wrote the judge

On Vallejo’s behalf, he had to

Make some comment.” First,

I told him I hadn’t gotten the

Information from Ms Maddow*

And second, that even a character 

Letter from the Pope wouldn’t

Have given Low permission to

Make such insensitive remarks

Before the victim. “You’re

Forgetting the victim has already

Received her justice: he sentenced

The dude to the max allowed.

What should she care what the 

Judge said about Vallejo? The 

Man made a mistake—a serious

Mistake—and he’s gonna pay. 

I’m just claiming what you libs

Always claim: Don’t condemn

A good life because of one

Mistake.”  I couldn’t understand

How he consistently missed 

Every point I mentioned about

The judge’s unprofessional,

Insensitive, chauvinist action.

I wasn’t getting anywhere as he

Remained adamantly opposed

And contended: “The judge did

As his office required. The guy

Got the maximum. All the rest

Is your misplaced liberal/progressive

Sympathies which don’t matter

In real life.” I tried everything I

Could but afterward realized I’d

Held back what could have 

Shifted his view. What if the 

Victims had been your daughters?









No comments:

Post a Comment