Civil resistance (satyagraha) comes with a price. |
To be effective is it enough
To be armed, or must one
Be armed and dangerous?
In today’s world who but
A fool thinks non-violence
Is the way to resolve disputes?
Everybody knows, even those
Who have not seen Indiana
Jones, you don’t bring a knife
To a gun fight. So why would
You bring nothing but conviction
To a gun fight? If your desire for
Self-sacrifice is that severe, kill
Yourself at home, spare the
Public the danger your silly act
Of confrontation would entail.
Even Gandhi would tell you
Stay out of it if you haven’t
Your satyagraha in order;
You’ll probably cause more
Damage than good. What’s this
“Truth-firmness” he’s talking about?
The truth in satyagraha requires
Love for the oppressor—pretty
Tough when you’re staring down
The barrel of a rifle, remembering
Mao Tse-tung stated “Political
Power grows out of the barrel
Of a gun.” The non-violence
Or civil disobedience of the
Protestor is more than a
Passive-aggressive substitute
Of force to defeat the other
But a truth-insistence aimed to
Convert the evildoer not to
Coerce him. Gandhi’s philosophy
Of the truth does not allow for
Violence in the process for
Such does not refine the conflict
But only transfers physical threat
To the next encounter. Many today
Are reading Ta-nehisi Coates who
Does not subscribe to religious
Values as Martin Luther King, Jr.,
Did. Instead he sees Black Power
More aptly displayed by gun-
Wielding Black Panthers as did
The early Malcolm X. White
Oppressors did not hesitate to
Inflict violence on King’s
Followers. Coates would
Rather resist forcibly and, if
Somebody is going to remove
His Black body from the earth,
They should know he will take
That one with him. It’s racial
Realpolitick addressed to the
Twenty-first century. He does
Not have King’s religious
Insight and hope to
Reconcile the conflict by
Love and patience. The best
Coates can offer sadly is
A parity of terror—not an
Elimination of it.
c. J.S.Manista, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment